http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/26/AR2010012601754.html

From  Washington City Paper: Young & Hungry – “Bottle Royale”.

Yikes! I’m not sure whether or not single beers should be sold here in DC, but man after reading the story I wonder how effective and fair the law will be in its current form.  No one contacted, including those who helped to write the law, seems to know what to do, or how to apply the new law.

Just by chance I happened to buy a single beer yesterday at our local Cleveland Park Liquor Store, and I must say I would miss the opportunity to do so.  I love trying new beers.  And frankly, I’d rather not worry about having to buy a bunch of beer I may not like.  What better way is there to explore the world of beer, than to try it for yourself?  In order for that exploration to take place it must be cost effective, especially considering today’s economy.  The only way it can be cost effective for me is if I can purchase singles which are probably smaller than 70oz.  Hopefully the DC Council doesn’t decide to expand the new law beyond its current borders.

What do you think?  Should store owners be allowed to sell single beers?

Secretary of State Al Jaeger, who thinks the law might attract business to North Dakota, supports the effort. “Our position was … we will build it,” Jaeger told the Journal. “If somebody wants to come and play in our ball field, that’s great.”

The North Dakota law is unlikely to draw much business to the state soon, experts say. But activist investors say the North Dakota law adds fuel to the debate over shareholder rights and oversight, which has intensified during the financial crisis.

See Law Blog – WSJ.com : North Dakota Sends Delaware a Wake-Up Call on Corporate Governance (links added).

[Begins slow clap . . . no one joins . . . starts typing again]

Maybe this just interests me because I’m currently enrolled in Business Associations.  Or maybe because I’m from ND I’m contractually bound to point out the state any time it appears in the national media.  Maybe I’m just addicted to the song of the western meadow lark.  I just don’t know.

Either way, I can’t remember the last time North Dakota was in the national news three days in a row [well maybe during the 1997 flood].  But here’s to you North Dakota, for trying to steal business from Delaware while Joe Biden isn’t standing guard on a slow news day.

I’m just going to pretend that this, “The Pride of Fargo” story doesn’t exist.

By the way ND, get out of the news: you’re blocking my view.

Good luck to all of the people I know, and all those who I don’t [to a lesser degree of course].

I know it seems like a “do or die” situation when you take it, but just remember its only a test and only the beginning of a long process. Don’t get to worked up about it and enjoy the rest of your day.

I thought waiting for the results to be posted was worse than the test itself, but you be the judge.

And if you really need some last minute tips:

I know I can’t carry all of my books at once, well at least easily without making my back sore.  I would love an E-reader solution or even pdf format casebooks.

There are many good books about legal writing and rhetoric, but Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges is one of the best I have read. Of course I was probably destined to reach that conclusion because the authors are two men whom I hold in high regard: Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner. Most books in this category don’t carry the impressive names that Making Your Case does, but there is more to this book than the names of a Supreme Court Justice and the editor of Black’s Legal Dictionary. The book is set up like most legal “nut shell” or horn books, where there are several chapters and sub-chapters with numbered points. The book mainly covers brief writing, and oral argument, but there is a small legal argument section at the beginning. Thrown in throughout the book are Scalia and Garner’s advice to young lawyers who are just beginning their practice. Make sure to glean the pages for these tidbits (I prefer to call them nuggets of wisdom), they are very telling of what works to persuade judges and what doesn’t.

Some of the best of Making Your Case‘s points (a quick sampling of a few points that peaked my interest — just a small taste of the contents) :

1. Outline Your Brief. I know it seems simple enough, but most lawyers (and especially law students) skip this step. The authors make their case that a well done outline of your brief is not only advantageous but necessary to your writing process.
2. Clarity, Clarity, Clarity. Writing a clear, and concise brief is the most important you should have for your brief. The authors said it best, “The clearer your arguments, the harder it will be for your opponent to mischaracterize them” (page 108).
3. “Formality bespeaks dignity.” When addressing judges or deciding whether or not to include a contraction in your brief, remember that some judges greatly value formality. So to be on the safe side, leave out the contractions and always address Judges in the correct way (check the local rules of the court on the titles of its judges) (page 118).
4. Avoid Acronyms. Enough said.
5. Say Thank you. Thank the court for paying attention to your arguments. Don’t over do it though. The authors say, a short “Thank you” is enough to end with. After that sit down.
6. Develop a reputation for excellence. Be very aware that you will probably frequent the same courts throughout your career. Because Judges (at least at the Federal level) are given life terms, you ought to bring your “A” game every time you appear before them (you appear through your brief as well as during your oral argument).

Making Your Case was clearly the best books on legal rhetoric I’ve read. It doesn’t go over formatting or CREAC, which I found enjoyable (which is also strangely refreshing – hearing about CREAC makes me want to vomit), but instead focuses on creating intelligent, respectful lawyers. The conversational tone in Making Your Case creates readable prose, which is much more than I can say for other books on this topic. The bottom line: If you are going to go to law school, or are in law school, this would be a good book to read. Its very informative with out being so detailed that it bores.

I purchased two new books today that I am eager to read. Both books are focused on the legal profession, specifically trying to help lawyers and law students understand how a judge thinks. I’ll post more on these two books as soon as I read them:

Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges by Antonin Scalia and Bryan A. Garner hit book stores today. Or at least it was supposed to be on sale today. I had to visit and call several bookstores before I found a store with the book in stock. Either way after wandering around DC for a bit I was rewarded with the latest in a long line of book designed to help lawyer’s and law student’s writing. Having Scalia’s name on this book certainly gives it some influential power: having a Supreme Court Justice’s opinion on legal writing is clearly a huge selling point. I’ve just started the book and have found it very readable so far (much more so than other books in this genre) and as soon as I finish it I will post my thoughts.

How Judges Think by Richard A. Posner attempts to offer people a window into a judges mind. I do not know much about this book, so I’ll wait until I’ve read it to discuss it further. Posner is a very large figure in the legal world, especially in regards to Law and Economics. He currently sits on the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Posner has already published over forty books, and I suspect this latest work will live up to his reputation.

More to follow on both of these books after I finish them.