Kurt Vonnegut, one of the most important and unique American writers, died recently. Most commonly known for his book Slaughterhouse-Five, Vonnegut wrote many other books. He also known for including his own artwork and doodles in his books and for also having an eccentric and original style of writing. You can visit this website to view Vonnegut’s complete works, as well as read a more complete biography.
I recently finished his last book, A Man Without a Country. It was a very quick read, being a short 140 pages (I read it entirely on a two hour plane ride). This book is somewhat different from some of his other works; it is not a novel, instead it is written in the form of a memoir. The Los Angeles Times pointed out: this may be the closest thing to a memoir that we ever see from Vonnegut; because of his recent death I suppose this must now be true. It’s differences aside, like all of his works that I have read, I throughly enjoyed every single page. Contained within this book were the same themes and subjects which Vonnegut’s other books were applauded for; although they were more explicit in form. In my view this explicit language enabled Vonnegut to explain some of his views, that I had long misunderstood. Vonnegut explains his views on socialism, music, life, religion and reality with the same wit and humor that he always employed. I now understand what Vonnegut means by saying that he is a humanist. Seriously take a look at his comments on religion in this book.
Vonnegut comments on may things in this book, even electronic communities. He stated, “Electronic communities build nothing. You wind up with nothing. We are dancing animals. How beautiful it is to get up and go out and do something. We are here on earth to fart around. Don’t let anyone tell you any different.” Which is an interesting topic. There are no physical connects with things like Facebook or MySpace(or any of the many similar online communities), so what is there true value. Vonnegut certainly was an advocate of getting out and meeting people…in the real world. He would go outside in order to talk to strangers about almost any topic solely to learn more about his fellow men. He explains this view’s importance clearly in A Man Without a Country. This book is worth reading. Read it quickly and take its lessons to heart, I’m going to go talk to some strangers outside.
I agree on a few points… mainly that our society is getting too comfortable sitting behind a computer screen all day. But I disagree with the fact that electronic communities build nothing. Being new to the blogging world, I’ve found that (thanks to the internet) people are able to continually share ideas, stories, and experiences through blogging. It’s allowed me to connect with some people that I never would have had the chance, since I’m stuck here in Iowa.
People definitely need to get out more, but we shouldn’t overlook the benefits that Web 2.0 brings to the table. Especially when used effectively.
Off topic, I’ve been trying to find who you are and why you author this site and either A) I’m an idiot or B) it’s not on here. Is there a reason for that? Just wondering. Cheers.
I too would generally agree with the point that there are redeeming qualities about electronic communities. But I think that Vonnegut probably intended to show the value of human contact. Vonnegut was not just some hippie, he was a humanist because of his experiences in World War Two, he witnessed the Dresden Firebombing, and out of that experience his view of human relationship became one of contact.
That said, he was not a rural person, which we both are, and an electronic community has much more value when real distances become an obstacle.
On your last question: I prefer to keep my online thoughts anonymous at least for the time being, but I know you personally so I’ll make sure to tell you.