I was a Rhetoric and Communications Studies major in college and from time to time I like to write a bit about it. And by “it” I really mean Rhetoric. I contemplated making these types of post private because most people won’t be interested in them, but ultimately decided to make them public for my own enjoyment. So here is an introduction to basic definitions of rhetoric.
The subject of Rhetoric has a very long tradition and that tradition has a unique construction. Rhetoric is usually defined against something. For example, “Rhetoric is not philosophy”; “Rhetoric is not linguistics”; et cetera. Because of this unique status, as being supposedly set opposed to philosophy and other disciplines, rhetoric does not have a single definition. Usually when terms or disciplines are transitory in state, they are discussed in a historical sense, but this is not so for rhetoric. There is no historical progression that links one definition of rhetoric with the next as stepping stones; rather definitions of rhetoric are more like leaves in the wind: They often intermingle, but there is neither rhyme nor reason to their movements (by this I mean, while the definition might be well reasoned, that there is no logical progression systematically linking one definition to all other definition. Compare it to some scientific definitions which are routinely updated and the old definitions are seen as wrong; and therefore never revisited.). That being said, here are some common/useful/interesting definitions of rhetoric provided by the English department of Stanford University here:
Some Definitions of Rhetoric
Plato: Rhetoric is “the art of winning the soul by discourse.”
Aristotle:
Rhetoric is “the faculty of discovering in any particular case all of the available means of persuasion.
Cicero: “Rhetoric is one great art comprised of five lesser arts: inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria, and pronunciatio.” Rhetoric is “speech designed to persuade.”
Quintillian: “Rhetoric is the art of speaking well.”
Francis Bacon: Rhetoric is the application of reason to imagination “for the better moving of the will.”
George Campbell: [Rhetoric] is that art or talent by which discourse is adapted to its end. The four ends of discourse are to enlighten the understanding, please the imagination, move the passion, and influence the will.
A. Richards: Rhetoric is the study of misunderstandings and their remedies.
Kenneth Burke: “Rhetoric is rooted in an essential function of language itself, afunction that is wholly realistic and continually born anew: the use language as a symbolic means of inducing cooperation in beings
that by nature respond to symbols.”
“Wherever there is persuasion, there is rhetoric, and wherever there is rhetoric, there is meaning.”
Richard Weaver: Rhetoric is that “which creates an informed appreciation for the good.”
Erika Lindemann: “Rhetoric is a form of reasoning about probabilities, based on assumptions people share as members of a community.”
Andrea Lunsford: “Rhetoric is the art, practice, and study of human communication.”
Francis Christensen: “Grammar maps out the possible; rhetoric narrows the possible down to the desirable or effective.” “The key question for rhetoric is how to know what is desirable.”
Sonja and Karen Foss: “Rhetoric is an action human beings perform when they use symbols for the purpose of communicating with one another . . , [and it] is a perspective humans take that involves focusing on symbolic processes.”
1. Boethius: Confessions (Howell’s translation)
Rhetoric treats of and discourses upon hypotheses, that is, questions with a multitude of surroundings in time and place, and if at any time it brings up a thesis, it uses it in connection with its hypothesis. These are its surroundings: Who? What? Where? By whose help? Why? In what manner? At what time?
2. James J. Murphy: “One Thousand Neglected Authors”
A rhetorician is someone who provides his fellows with useful precepts or directions for organizing and presenting his ideas or feeling to them. (20)
3. Marc Fumaroli: “Rhetoric, Politics and Society”
Rhetoric appears as the connective tissue peculiar to civil society and to its proper finalities, happiness and political peace hic et nunc. (253-4)
4. Kenneth Burke: A Rhetoric of Motives
The most characteristic concern of rhetoric [is] the manipulation of men’s beliefs for political ends….the basic function of rhetoric [is] the use of words by human agents to form attitudes or to induce actions in other human agents. (41)
From <http://campus.northpark.edu/english/rhetdef.htm>:
5. Covino and Joliffe:
Rhetoric: Concepts, Definitions, Boundaries (1995)
Rhetoric is primarily a verbal, situationally contingent, epistemic art that is both philosophical and practical and gives rise to potentially active texts.
6. Paolo Valesio: Novantiqua (1980)
I specify now that rhetoric is the functional organization of discourse, within its social and cultural context, in all its aspects, exception made for its realization as a strictly formal metalanguage–in formal logic, mathematics, and in the sciences whose metalanguages share the same features. In other words: rhetoric is all of language, in its realization as discourse.
7. George Kennedy: “A Hoot in the Dark” (1992)
Rhetoric in the most general sense may perhaps be identified with the energy inherent in communication: the emotional energy that impels the speaker to speak, the physical energy expanded in the utterance, the energy level coded in the message, and the energy experienced by the recipient in decoding the message.
(More …)
DRAKE WINS! 20 Game Win Streak!